Re: [PATCH v1 10/16] s390/pci: return error code from s390_dma_map_sg()
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-07-16 08:24:48
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-iommu, linux-mips, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 10:45 -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Martin Oliveira <redacted> The .map_sg() op now expects an error code instead of zero on failure. So propagate the error from __s390_dma_map_sg() up. Signed-off-by: Martin Oliveira <redacted> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <redacted> --- arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c index ebc9a49523aa..c78b02012764 100644 --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int max = dma_get_max_seg_size(dev); unsigned int size = s->offset + s->length; unsigned int offset = s->offset; - int count = 0, i; + int count = 0, i, ret; for (i = 1; i < nr_elements; i++) { s = sg_next(s);@@ -497,8 +497,9 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, if (s->offset || (size & ~PAGE_MASK) || size + s->length > max) { - if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, - &dma->dma_address, dir)) + ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, + &dma->dma_address, dir); + if (ret) goto unmap; dma->dma_address += offset;@@ -511,7 +512,8 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, } size += s->length; } - if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir)) + ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir); + if (ret) goto unmap; dma->dma_address += offset;@@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, s390_dma_unmap_pages(dev, sg_dma_address(s), sg_dma_len(s), dir, attrs); - return 0; + return ret; } static void s390_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
So the error codes we return are -ENOMEM if allocating a DMA translation entry fails and -EINVAL if the DMA translation table hasn't been initialized or the caller tries to map 0 sized memory. Are these error codes that you would expect? If yes then this change looks good to me. Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel