Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 6 authors, 2021-07-19

Re: [PATCH v1 10/16] s390/pci: return error code from s390_dma_map_sg()

From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-07-16 08:24:48
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-iommu, linux-mips, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel

On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 10:45 -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Martin Oliveira <redacted>

The .map_sg() op now expects an error code instead of zero on failure.

So propagate the error from __s390_dma_map_sg() up.

Signed-off-by: Martin Oliveira <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <redacted>
---
 arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
index ebc9a49523aa..c78b02012764 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 	unsigned int max = dma_get_max_seg_size(dev);
 	unsigned int size = s->offset + s->length;
 	unsigned int offset = s->offset;
-	int count = 0, i;
+	int count = 0, i, ret;
 
 	for (i = 1; i < nr_elements; i++) {
 		s = sg_next(s);
@@ -497,8 +497,9 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 
 		if (s->offset || (size & ~PAGE_MASK) ||
 		    size + s->length > max) {
-			if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size,
-					      &dma->dma_address, dir))
+			ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size,
+						&dma->dma_address, dir);
+			if (ret)
 				goto unmap;
 
 			dma->dma_address += offset;
@@ -511,7 +512,8 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 		}
 		size += s->length;
 	}
-	if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir))
+	ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir);
+	if (ret)
 		goto unmap;
 
 	dma->dma_address += offset;
@@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 		s390_dma_unmap_pages(dev, sg_dma_address(s), sg_dma_len(s),
 				     dir, attrs);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void s390_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
So the error codes we return are -ENOMEM if allocating a DMA
translation entry fails and -EINVAL if the DMA translation table hasn't
been initialized or the caller tries to map 0 sized memory. Are these
error codes that you would expect? If yes then this change looks good
to me.

Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help