On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:04:38PM +0000, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index 8d42da5dd1d4..5741b1dd3c14 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -2299,7 +2299,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
* because hbus->bridge->bus may not exist yet.
*/
wslot = wslot_to_devfn(hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot);
- pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(hbus->sysdata.domain, 0, wslot);
+ pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(hbus->bridge->domain_nr, 0, wslot);
if (pdev) {
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);@@ -3071,6 +3071,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
"PCI dom# 0x%hx has collision, using 0x%hx",
dom_req, dom);
+ hbus->bridge->domain_nr = dom;
hbus->sysdata.domain = dom;
With your other patches everything is moving over to based off of bridge->domain_nr.
Do we still need to update sysdata.domain?
Yes, we still need it, because x86 is not a CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y
architecture, and this patchset only makes CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y
archs work with bridge->domain_nr. x86 still use the arch-specific
pci_domain_nr(), so we need to set the field in sysdata.
Regards,
Boqun
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel