Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2021-07-01

Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: Avoid accessing PCIe registers with clocks gated

flat view

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-06-25 07:09:45
Also in: linux-pci, linux-rockchip, linux-tegra, lkml

Hello Bjorn,

On 6/25/21 12:40 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[+cc Michal, Ley Foon, Jingoo, Thierry, Jonathan]

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 10:04:09AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
quoted
IRQ handlers that are registered for shared interrupts can be called at
any time after have been registered using the request_irq() function.

It's up to drivers to ensure that's always safe for these to be called.

Both the "pcie-sys" and "pcie-client" interrupts are shared, but since
their handlers are registered very early in the probe function, an error
later can lead to these handlers being executed before all the required
resources have been properly setup.

For example, the rockchip_pcie_read() function used by these IRQ handlers
expects that some PCIe clocks will already be enabled, otherwise trying
to access the PCIe registers causes the read to hang and never return.

The CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ option tests if drivers are able to cope with their
shared interrupt handlers being called, by generating a spurious interrupt
just before a shared interrupt handler is unregistered.

But this means that if the option is enabled, any error in the probe path
of this driver could lead to one of the IRQ handlers to be executed.
I'm not an IRQ expert, but I think this is an issue regardless of
CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ, isn't it?  Anything used by an IRQ handler should
be initialized before the handler is registered.  CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
is just a way to help find latent problems.
Yes, it's an issue regardless. It's just that this debug option tests if the
drivers aren't making the wrong assumption, exactly to find issues like this.
quoted
In a rockpro64 board, the following sequence of events happens:

  1) "pcie-sys" IRQ is requested and its handler registered.
  2) "pcie-client" IRQ is requested and its handler registered.
  3) probe later fails due readl_poll_timeout() returning a timeout.
  4) the "pcie-sys" IRQ is unregistered.
  5) CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ triggers a spurious interrupt.
  6) "pcie-client" IRQ handler is called for this spurious interrupt.
  7) IRQ handler tries to read PCIE_CLIENT_INT_STATUS with clocks gated.
  8) the machine hangs because rockchip_pcie_read() call never returns.

To avoid cases like this, the handlers don't have to be registered until
very late in the probe function, once all the resources have been setup.

So let's just move all the IRQ init before the pci_host_probe() call, that
will prevent issues like this and seems to be the correct thing to do too.
Previously we registered rockchip_pcie_subsys_irq_handler() and
rockchip_pcie_client_irq_handler() before the PCIe clocks were
enabled.  That's a problem because they depend on those clocks being
enabled, and your patch fixes that.

rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler() depends on rockchip->irq_domain,
which isn't initialized until rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain().
Previously we registered rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler() as the
handler for the "legacy" IRQ before rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain().

I think you patch *also* fixes that problem, right?
Correct, that's why I moved the initialization and IRQ enable after that.
 
I think this is also an issue with the following other drivers.  They all
set the handler to something that uses an IRQ domain before they
actually initialize the domain:
Yes, I agreed with your assessment and also noticed that others drivers have
similar issues. I just don't have any of those platforms to try to reproduce
the bugs and test a fix.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer
New Platform Technologies Enablement team
RHEL Engineering


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help