Re: [PATCH v16 3/7] KVM: arm64: Introduce MTE VM feature
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-21 09:01:05
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml, qemu-devel
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:28:22 +0100, Steven Price [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a new VM feature 'KVM_ARM_CAP_MTE' which enables memory tagging for a VM. This will expose the feature to the guest and automatically tag memory pages touched by the VM as PG_mte_tagged (and clear the tag storage) to ensure that the guest cannot see stale tags, and so that the tags are correctly saved/restored across swap. Actually exposing the new capability to user space happens in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 3 ++ arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 3 +- arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 7 ++++ include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h index f612c090f2e4..6bf776c2399c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ static inline void vcpu_reset_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE) || vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu)) vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_TID2; + + if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm)) + vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_ATA; } static inline unsigned long *vcpu_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 7cd7d5c8c4bc..afaa5333f0e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ struct kvm_arch { u8 pfr0_csv2; u8 pfr0_csv3; + /* Memory Tagging Extension enabled for the guest */ + bool mte_enabled; }; struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info {@@ -769,6 +771,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); #define kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu) \ ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED) +#define kvm_has_mte(kvm) (system_supports_mte() && (kvm)->arch.mte_enabled) #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) \ (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, (vcpu)->arch.features))diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c index 73629094f903..56426565600c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ static void enter_exception64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long target_mode, new |= (old & PSR_C_BIT); new |= (old & PSR_V_BIT); - // TODO: TCO (if/when ARMv8.5-MemTag is exposed to guests) + if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm)) + new |= PSR_TCO_BIT; new |= (old & PSR_DIT_BIT);diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c index c5d1f3c87dbd..f5305b7561ad 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c@@ -822,6 +822,45 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, return PAGE_SIZE; } +/* + * The page will be mapped in stage 2 as Normal Cacheable, so the VM will be + * able to see the page's tags and therefore they must be initialised first. If + * PG_mte_tagged is set, tags have already been initialised. + * + * The race in the test/set of the PG_mte_tagged flag is handled by: + * - preventing VM_SHARED mappings in a memslot with MTE preventing two VMs + * racing to santise the same page + * - mmap_lock protects between a VM faulting a page in and the VMM performing + * an mprotect() to add VM_MTE + */ +static int sanitise_mte_tags(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, + unsigned long size) +{ + unsigned long i, nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT; + struct page *page; + + if (!kvm_has_mte(kvm)) + return 0; + + /* + * pfn_to_online_page() is used to reject ZONE_DEVICE pages + * that may not support tags. + */ + page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn); + + if (!page) + return -EFAULT; + + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, page++) { + if (!test_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags)) { + mte_clear_page_tags(page_address(page)); + set_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags); + } + } + + return 0; +} + static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva, unsigned long fault_status)@@ -971,8 +1010,16 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, if (writable) prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W; - if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device) + if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device) { + /* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new VM_SHARED VMA */ + if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) + return -EINVAL;
nit: I'd rather we return -EFAULT here. That's consistent with other cases where we can't satisfy the mapping. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel