Re: [PATCH v4] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2021-06-17 00:23:08
Also in:
linux-mediatek, lkml
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:02:27 -0400 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:41:26 +0800 Mark-PK Tsai [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0. This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX. Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> [handle endianness of sym->st_shndx] Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> ---Thanks, I pulled this in and started the testing.
It passed my normal tests. I'll run my cross compile test, and I just pushed it to linux-next. I'll wait a few days before I push it to Linus. -- Steve _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel