Re: [next] [arm64] kernel BUG at arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-15 23:34:31
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-next, lkml, regressions
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-15 23:34:31
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-next, lkml, regressions
Hi all, On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:21:32 +0300 Mike Rapoport [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:50:31AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:quoted
On 6/15/2021 9:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:quoted
Looking some more, it looks like that's correct in isolation, but it clashes with commit: 5831eedad2ac6f38 ("mm: replace CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with CONFIG_NUMA")Just a data point. Reverting the commit alone fixed the same crash for me.Yeah, that commit didn't take into the account the change in pgdat_to_phys(). The patch below should fix it. In the long run I think we should get rid of contig_page_data and allocate NODE_DATA(0) for !NUMA case as well. Andrew, can you please add this as a fixup to "mm: replace CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with CONFIG_NUMA"?diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c index a0e9cdb5bc38..6326cdf36c4f 100644 --- a/mm/sparse.c +++ b/mm/sparse.c@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ size_t mem_section_usage_size(void) static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat) { -#ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES +#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA return __pa_symbol(pgdat); #else return __pa(pgdat);
Added to linux-next today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell