The division macro DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST takes int values as the argument.
However the code here uses unsigned int values for this, which is
causing the values comparison with 0 as always true. We can use
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL instead for the same.
Addresses-coverity: ("result_independent_of_operands")
Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <redacted>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
index 98671a3..510d8fc 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static void sdhci_arasan_update_baseclkfreq(struct sdhci_host *host)
struct sdhci_arasan_data *sdhci_arasan = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
const struct sdhci_arasan_soc_ctl_map *soc_ctl_map =
sdhci_arasan->soc_ctl_map;
- u32 mhz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk), 1000000);
+ u32 mhz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk), 1000000);
/* Having a map is optional */
if (!soc_ctl_map)
--
2.1.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel