Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-14

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] thermal: sprd: add missing of_node_put for loop iteration

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-14 19:16:21
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On 14/06/2021 19:28, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 28/05/2021 13:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
Early exits from for_each_available_child_of_node() should decrement the
node reference counter.  Reported by Coccinelle:

  drivers/thermal/sprd_thermal.c:387:1-23: WARNING:
    Function "for_each_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before goto around lines 391.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/sprd_thermal.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sprd_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sprd_thermal.c
index 3682edb2f466..2778971aaf03 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/sprd_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/sprd_thermal.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int sprd_thm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		sen = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sen), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!sen) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			of_node_put(sen_child);
Why not a new label for the rollback routine?

eg. goto out_of_node_put;
Indeed, this should work. When loops end, the sen_child is set to NULL
so of_node_putting it should be fine.
Or a new function devm_for_each_available_child_of_node() ?
Since there are multiple flavors of this for_each_loop, that might be
too much...


Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help