On 11/06/2021 21:24, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:27:14AM +0100, Matthew Hagan wrote:
quoted
Add Makefile entries for the Meraki MX64/MX65 series devices.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
index f8f09c5066e7..033d9604db60 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
@@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_NSP) += \
bcm958525xmc.dtb \
bcm958622hr.dtb \
bcm958623hr.dtb \
+ bcm958625-meraki-mx64.dtb \
+ bcm958625-meraki-mx64-a0.dtb \
+ bcm958625-meraki-mx64w.dtb \
+ bcm958625-meraki-mx64w-a0.dtb \
+ bcm958625-meraki-mx65.dtb \
+ bcm958625-meraki-mx65w.dtb \
bcm958625hr.dtb \
bcm988312hr.dtb \
bcm958625k.dtb
--
2.26.3
It is odd to add the device trees to the Makefile in a separate patch
compared to their actual introduction. Does the tree even compile at
this stage?
Will rectify this. Thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel