Re: [PATCH v5 13/16] media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Date: 2021-06-10 12:02:23
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-media, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 09:53 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
Hi Yong, On 12/05/2021 14:29, Yong Wu wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 17:20 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:quoted
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 5:14 PM Yong Wu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the consumer and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the pm_runtime_get_sync, the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called automatically. CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> CC: Irui Wang <redacted> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <redacted> Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> --- .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c | 37 ++------------- .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h | 3 -- .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c | 1 - .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c | 46 ++----------------- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)[...]quoted
quoted
@@ -108,13 +80,6 @@ void mtk_vcodec_enc_clock_on(struct mtk_vcodec_pm *pm) } } - ret = mtk_smi_larb_get(pm->larbvenc); - if (ret) { - mtk_v4l2_err("mtk_smi_larb_get larb3 fail %d", ret); - goto clkerr; - } - return;You can't delete the return; here, otherwise vcodec_clk will be turned off immediately after they are turned on.Thanks very much for your review. Sorry for this. You are quite right. I checked this, it was introduced in v4 when I rebase the code. I will fix it in next time.Please also make sure that you add all maintainers. I realized that at least for the media/platform drivers we miss the maintainer and the corresponding mailing list. This is especially important in this series, as it spans several subsystems.
Thanks for hint. I only added the file maintainer here. I will add linux-media in next version. By the way, this patchset cross several trees, then which tree should it go through. Do you have some suggestion?
Thanks a lot, Matthiasquoted
quoted
quoted
- clkerr: for (i -= 1; i >= 0; i--) clk_disable_unprepare(enc_clk->clk_info[i].vcodec_clk);@@ -125,7 +90,6 @@ void mtk_vcodec_enc_clock_off(struct mtk_vcodec_pm *pm) struct mtk_vcodec_clk *enc_clk = &pm->venc_clk; int i = 0; - mtk_smi_larb_put(pm->larbvenc); for (i = enc_clk->clk_num - 1; i >= 0; i--) clk_disable_unprepare(enc_clk->clk_info[i].vcodec_clk); } --2.18.0
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel