Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2021-06-10

Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8195 SoC

From: James Lo <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-10 02:44:19
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 10:06 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 09/06/2021 09:51, Fei Shao wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:21 PM James Lo [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
From: Henry Chen <redacted>

MT8195 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6359 for
power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
access PMIC_MT6359.

Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <redacted>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 35
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
index e4de75f35c33..952bc554f443 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -961,6 +961,23 @@ static int mt8183_regs[] = {
        [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] =                  0xC28,
 };

+static int mt8195_regs[] = {
+       [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] =            0x0,
+       [PWRAP_STAUPD_CTRL] =           0x4C,
+       [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] =              0x3E4,
+       [PWRAP_INT_EN] =                0x420,
+       [PWRAP_INT_FLG] =               0x428,
+       [PWRAP_INT_CLR] =               0x42C,
+       [PWRAP_INT1_EN] =               0x450,
+       [PWRAP_INT1_FLG] =              0x458,
+       [PWRAP_INT1_CLR] =              0x45C,
+       [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] =             0x880,
+       [PWRAP_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] =    0x884,
+       [PWRAP_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] =    0x894,
+       [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] =          0x8A4,
+       [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] =           0x8A8,
+};
+
 static int mt8516_regs[] = {
        [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] =               0x0,
        [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] =               0x4,
@@ -1066,6 +1083,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
        PWRAP_MT8135,
        PWRAP_MT8173,
        PWRAP_MT8183,
+       PWRAP_MT8195,
        PWRAP_MT8516,
 };
@@ -1525,6 +1543,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct
pmic_wrapper *wrp)
                break;
        case PWRAP_MT6873:
        case PWRAP_MT8183:
+       case PWRAP_MT8195:
                break;
        }
@@ -2025,6 +2044,19 @@ static const struct pmic_wrapper_type
pwrap_mt8183 = {
        .init_soc_specific = pwrap_mt8183_init_soc_specific,
 };

+static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8195 = {
+       .regs = mt8195_regs,
+       .type = PWRAP_MT8195,
+       .arb_en_all = 0x777f, /* NEED CONFIRM */
+       .int_en_all = 0x180000, /* NEED CONFIRM */
Please get the confirmative values here then send the next patch,
thanks.
Yes please. You can send this as a follow-up patch, otherwise I'd
need to remove
this from my queue, as I have overseen the fact that not all values
are confirmed.

Regards,
Matthias
All values are confirmed and sorry for I forget to remove those
comments. Could you please help us to remove those comments ?

Before :
.arb_en_all = 0x777f, /* NEED CONFIRM */
.int_en_all = 0x180000, /* NEED CONFIRM */

After :
.arb_en_all = 0x777f,
.int_en_all = 0x180000,

Many thanks
James Lo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help