Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8195 SoC
From: James Lo <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-10 02:44:19
Also in:
linux-mediatek, lkml
On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 10:06 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 09/06/2021 09:51, Fei Shao wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:21 PM James Lo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Henry Chen <redacted> MT8195 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6359 for power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to access PMIC_MT6359. Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <redacted> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.cb/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c index e4de75f35c33..952bc554f443 100644--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c@@ -961,6 +961,23 @@ static int mt8183_regs[] = { [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0xC28, }; +static int mt8195_regs[] = { + [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] = 0x0, + [PWRAP_STAUPD_CTRL] = 0x4C, + [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] = 0x3E4, + [PWRAP_INT_EN] = 0x420, + [PWRAP_INT_FLG] = 0x428, + [PWRAP_INT_CLR] = 0x42C, + [PWRAP_INT1_EN] = 0x450, + [PWRAP_INT1_FLG] = 0x458, + [PWRAP_INT1_CLR] = 0x45C, + [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] = 0x880, + [PWRAP_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] = 0x884, + [PWRAP_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] = 0x894, + [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0x8A4, + [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] = 0x8A8, +}; + static int mt8516_regs[] = { [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] = 0x0, [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] = 0x4,@@ -1066,6 +1083,7 @@ enum pwrap_type { PWRAP_MT8135, PWRAP_MT8173, PWRAP_MT8183, + PWRAP_MT8195, PWRAP_MT8516, };@@ -1525,6 +1543,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(structpmic_wrapper *wrp) break; case PWRAP_MT6873: case PWRAP_MT8183: + case PWRAP_MT8195: break; }@@ -2025,6 +2044,19 @@ static const struct pmic_wrapper_typepwrap_mt8183 = { .init_soc_specific = pwrap_mt8183_init_soc_specific, }; +static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8195 = { + .regs = mt8195_regs, + .type = PWRAP_MT8195, + .arb_en_all = 0x777f, /* NEED CONFIRM */ + .int_en_all = 0x180000, /* NEED CONFIRM */Please get the confirmative values here then send the next patch, thanks.Yes please. You can send this as a follow-up patch, otherwise I'd need to remove this from my queue, as I have overseen the fact that not all values are confirmed. Regards, Matthias
All values are confirmed and sorry for I forget to remove those comments. Could you please help us to remove those comments ? Before : .arb_en_all = 0x777f, /* NEED CONFIRM */ .int_en_all = 0x180000, /* NEED CONFIRM */ After : .arb_en_all = 0x777f, .int_en_all = 0x180000, Many thanks James Lo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel