[PATCH v9 13/20] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-08 18:04:36
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
Subsystem:
scheduler, the rest · Maintainers:
Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot, Linus Torvalds
In preparation for restricting the affinity of a task during execve() on arm64, introduce a new dl_task_check_affinity() helper function to give an indication as to whether the restricted mask is admissible for a deadline task. Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <redacted> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++++ kernel/sched/core.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 91a6cfeae242..b9d0df8f7153 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h@@ -1691,6 +1691,7 @@ extern void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new extern int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask); extern int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src, int node); extern void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p); +extern int dl_task_check_affinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask); extern void force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p); extern void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p); #else
@@ -1713,6 +1714,11 @@ static inline void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) { WARN_ON(p->user_cpus_ptr); } + +static inline int dl_task_check_affinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask) +{ + return 0; +} #endif extern int yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d3d5e8b33961..d2fe6f8b8f6f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c@@ -6935,6 +6935,32 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr, return retval; } +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +int dl_task_check_affinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask) +{ + int ret = 0; + + /* + * If the task isn't a deadline task or admission control is + * disabled then we don't care about affinity changes. + */ + if (!task_has_dl_policy(p) || !dl_bandwidth_enabled()) + return 0; + + /* + * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis, + * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline + * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's + * root_domain. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); + if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, mask)) + ret = -EBUSY; + rcu_read_unlock(); + return ret; +} +#endif + static int __sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask) {
@@ -6952,23 +6978,9 @@ __sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask) cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed); cpumask_and(new_mask, mask, cpus_allowed); - /* - * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis, - * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline - * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's - * root_domain. - */ -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) { - rcu_read_lock(); - if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) { - retval = -EBUSY; - rcu_read_unlock(); - goto out_free_new_mask; - } - rcu_read_unlock(); - } -#endif + retval = dl_task_check_affinity(p, new_mask); + if (retval) + goto out_free_new_mask; again: retval = __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, SCA_CHECK | SCA_USER); if (retval)
--
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel