Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] PM: runtime: Update behaviour for no callbacks

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 11:02:47AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:

While reviewing a patch on the mmc-list, I ended up inspecting the behaviour of
how we deal with the no callback case for runtime PM.

A couple of observations:

*) When pm_runtime_no_callbacks() have been called, it allows the PM core to
takes a quicker path, but at the same time, consumer/supplier device links are
being skipped in rpm_resume|suspend().

**) Calling pm_runtime_no_callbacks() to avoid boiler plate code (assigning
empty functions to ->runtime_suspend|resume()), doesn't work if there could be
consumer/supplier device link being used or a platform dependent PM domain that
could get attached to the device.

Therefore, this series suggests to change the behaviour in the PM core, to
allow the ->runtime_suspend|resume() callbacks to be unassigned. This is already
supported for ->runtime_idle() callbacks, so it would also move things into a
more consistent behaviour.

I have looked at various error paths, in the kernel of callers of
pm_runtime_get_sync(). I couldn't find anyone that made sense, that looked for
the special error code, -ENOSYS, which is the error code getting returned when a
callback is missing. Whether that is sufficient proof that these changes are
100% safe, I can't guarantee, but I think it would be worth a try as the
benefits of avoiding boilerplate code and the corresponding additional code
paths are quite nice, if you ask me.

In principle I have no objection to these changes.  It's likely 
that if any problems do crop up, we'll be able to fix them pretty 
easily.  For patches 1 and 2:

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel