Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: arm64: Move I-cache flush to the fault handlers
From: wangyanan (Y) <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-03 12:35:25
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, lkml
Hi Quentin, On 2021/6/2 18:58, Quentin Perret wrote:
On Thursday 15 Apr 2021 at 19:50:31 (+0800), Yanan Wang wrote:quoted
In this patch, we move invalidation of I-cache to the fault handlers toNit: please avoid using 'This patch' in commit messages, see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
Thanks! I will get rid of this.
quoted
avoid unnecessary I-cache maintenances. On the map path, invalidate the I-cache if we are going to create an executable stage-2 mapping for guest. And on the permission path, invalidate the I-cache if we are going to add an executable permission to the existing guest stage-2 mapping. Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <redacted> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 15 -------------- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 9 +------- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h index e9b163c5f023..155492fe5b15 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h@@ -187,21 +187,6 @@ static inline bool vcpu_has_cache_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return (vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) & 0b101) == 0b101; } -static inline void __invalidate_icache_guest_page(kvm_pfn_t pfn, - unsigned long size) -{ - if (icache_is_aliasing()) { - /* any kind of VIPT cache */ - __flush_icache_all(); - } else if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() || !icache_is_vpipt()) { - /* PIPT or VPIPT at EL2 (see comment in __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa) */ - void *va = page_address(pfn_to_page(pfn)); - - invalidate_icache_range((unsigned long)va, - (unsigned long)va + size); - } -} - void kvm_set_way_flush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_toggle_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool was_enabled);diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c index b480f6d1171e..9f4429d80df0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c@@ -568,6 +568,26 @@ static bool stage2_pte_cacheable(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, kvm_pte_t pte) return memattr == KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL); } +static bool stage2_pte_executable(kvm_pte_t pte) +{ + return !(pte & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN); +} + +static void stage2_invalidate_icache(void *addr, u64 size) +{ + if (icache_is_aliasing()) { + /* Any kind of VIPT cache */ + __flush_icache_all(); + } else if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() || !icache_is_vpipt()) {quoted
+ /* + * See comment in __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(). + * Invalidate PIPT, or VPIPT at EL2. + */ + invalidate_icache_range((unsigned long)addr, + (unsigned long)addr + size); + } +} + static void stage2_put_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 addr, u32 level, struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops) {@@ -618,6 +638,10 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, if (stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new) && !stage2_has_fwb(pgt)) __flush_dcache_area(mm_ops->phys_to_virt(phys), granule); + + if (stage2_pte_executable(new)) + stage2_invalidate_icache(mm_ops->phys_to_virt(phys), + granule); } smp_store_release(ptep, new);@@ -896,8 +920,17 @@ static int stage2_attr_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep, * but worst-case the access flag update gets lost and will be * set on the next access instead. */ - if (data->pte != pte) + if (data->pte != pte) { + /* + * Invalidate the instruction cache before updating + * if we are going to add the executable permission + * for the guest stage-2 PTE. + */ + if (!stage2_pte_executable(*ptep) && stage2_pte_executable(pte)) + stage2_invalidate_icache(kvm_pte_follow(pte, data->mm_ops), + kvm_granule_size(level)); WRITE_ONCE(*ptep, pte); + }As for the dcache stuff, it seems like this would be best placed in an optional mm_ops callback, and have the kernel implement it.
I think so, that is the preferred way. Thanks, Yanan
Thanks, Quentin .
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel