Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: OP-TEE as transport channel for SCMI messages
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-02 10:53:25
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Introduce compatible "linaro,scmi-optee" for SCMI transport channel based on an OP-TEE service invocation. Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <redacted> --- Changes since v1: - Removed modification regarding mboxes property description. --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt index 856d041b397e..ccab2ef6f6ec 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ Required properties: The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node. -- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" for smc/hvc transports +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" for smc/hvc transports, + or "linaro,scmi-optee" for OP-TEE transport.
Please rebase this [1] when you post next version. It is not clear about the mailbox or shmem properties here for this new OP-TEE transport but I assume it will be easier to understand with yaml schema. -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210601224904.917990-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com/ (local) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel