Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mm: Refactor __do_page_fault()
From: Kefeng Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-02 06:42:20
Also in:
lkml
On 2021/6/1 22:31, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:41:37AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:quoted
1. cleanup access_error(), make vma flags set and check into __do_page_fault() and do_page_fault() directly. 2. drop fsr and task argument, instead, using vm_flags in __do_page_fault(). 3. cleans up the multiple goto statements in __do_page_fault(). 4. use current->mm directly in do_page_fault(). Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <redacted>This patch is a really good example of something that is very difficult to review and see that there are no unintended changes. Many people have complained about my patches, where I create a series of many patches where each patch does exactly _one_ simple transformation to the code. This is a good example _why_ I do that - a step by step single transformation approach is way easier to review. Sorry, but I'm not able to sensibly review this patch, and therefore I won't apply it. Please split it into smaller changes.
Ok, will split it and send v2, thanks.
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel