Re: [PATCH 3/7] KVM: arm64: Remove list_head from hyp_page
From: Quentin Perret <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-01 15:48:25
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
On Tuesday 01 Jun 2021 at 15:38:22 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2021 13:51:30 +0100, Quentin Perret [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+/* + * Pages that are available for allocation are tracked in free-lists, so we use + * the pages themselves to store the list nodes to avoid wasting space. As the + * allocator always returns zeroed pages (which are zeroed on the hyp_put_page() + * path to optimize allocation speed), we also need to clean-up the list node in + * each page when we take it out of the list. + */ +static inline void page_remove_from_list(struct hyp_page *p) +{ + struct list_head *node = (struct list_head *)hyp_page_to_virt(p);Nit: How about changing hyp_page_to_virt() so that it returns a convenient 'void *', and get rid of the ugly casts?
It should already return void *, but I kind of liked the explicit cast here for documentation purpose. We're turning a 'random' piece of unused memory into a typed object, so that felt like a useful annotation. Happy to get rid of it though.
quoted
+ + __list_del_entry(node); + memset(node, 0, sizeof(*node)); +} + +static inline void page_add_to_list(struct hyp_page *p, struct list_head *head) +{ + struct list_head *node = (struct list_head *)hyp_page_to_virt(p); + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(node); + list_add_tail(node, head); +} + +static inline struct hyp_page *node_to_page(struct list_head *node) +{ + return (struct hyp_page *)hyp_virt_to_page(node);Why is this cast necessary? If I'm not mistaken, hyp_vmemmap is already cast as a 'struct hyp_page *', so hyp_virt_to_page() should return the same type.
Right, that one is totally unnecessary, I'll remove. Cheers, Quentin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel