Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Rewrite __arch_clear_user()
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2021-05-27 13:36:09
On 2021-05-26 12:15, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:57:07PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:quoted
Now that we're always using STTR variants rather than abstracting two different addressing modes, the user_ldst macro here is frankly more obfuscating than helpful. Rewrite __arch_clear_user() with regular USER() annotations so that it's clearer what's going on, and take the opportunity to minimise the branchiness in the most common paths, while also allowing the exception fixup to return an accurate result. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> --- v2: Tweak exception fixup to be exact arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S index af9afcbec92c..d30c03f6caed 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ /* - * Based on arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S - * - * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd. + * Copyright (C) 2021 Arm Ltd. */ -#include <linux/linkage.h> -#include <asm/asm-uaccess.h> +#include <linux/linkage.h> #include <asm/assembler.h> .text@@ -19,25 +16,30 @@ * * Alignment fixed up by hardware. */ + .p2align 4Could we note the reason for the alignment in the commit message? IIUC that's for consistency with the other routines.
Yes, it's alignment for the loop as per the other routines - since the prologue (including BTI landing pad) is the same length as we're aligning to, then we may as well let any padding fall outside the function. I'll comment that in the code, since it might be a bit subtle.
Regardless, this looks good to me. I hand-executed this for `sz` in the range 0 to 7 to make sure the logic and fixups were correct, and that all looks good to me. FWIW: Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks! I'll clarify the relevant commit messages about the relicensing as well and repost the series shortly, unless there are any further comments. Cheers, Robin.
Mark.quoted
SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_clear_user) - mov x2, x1 // save the size for fixup return + add x2, x0, x1 subs x1, x1, #8 b.mi 2f 1: -user_ldst 9f, sttr, xzr, x0, 8 +USER(9f, sttr xzr, [x0]) + add x0, x0, #8 subs x1, x1, #8 - b.pl 1b -2: adds x1, x1, #4 - b.mi 3f -user_ldst 9f, sttr, wzr, x0, 4 - sub x1, x1, #4 -3: adds x1, x1, #2 - b.mi 4f -user_ldst 9f, sttrh, wzr, x0, 2 - sub x1, x1, #2 -4: adds x1, x1, #1 - b.mi 5f -user_ldst 9f, sttrb, wzr, x0, 0 + b.hi 1b +USER(9f, sttr xzr, [x2, #-8]) + mov x0, #0 + ret + +2: tbz x1, #2, 3f +USER(9f, sttr wzr, [x0]) +USER(8f, sttr wzr, [x2, #-4]) + mov x0, #0 + ret + +3: tbz x1, #1, 4f +USER(9f, sttrh wzr, [x0]) +4: tbz x1, #0, 5f +USER(7f, sttrb wzr, [x2, #-1]) 5: mov x0, #0 ret SYM_FUNC_END(__arch_clear_user)@@ -45,6 +47,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__arch_clear_user) .section .fixup,"ax" .align 2 -9: mov x0, x2 // return the original size +7: sub x0, x2, #5 // Adjust for faulting on the final byte... +8: add x0, x0, #4 // ...or the second word of the 4-7 byte case +9: sub x0, x2, x0 ret .previous-- 2.21.0.dirty
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel