Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: arm64: Make kvm_skip_instr() and co private to HYP
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-06 17:19:09
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:02 +0100, Zenghui Yu [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Marc, On 2020/11/3 0:40, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
In an effort to remove the vcpu PC manipulations from EL1 on nVHE systems, move kvm_skip_instr() to be HYP-specific. EL1's intent to increment PC post emulation is now signalled via a flag in the vcpu structure. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>[...]quoted
@@ -133,6 +134,8 @@ static int __kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) __load_guest_stage2(vcpu->arch.hw_mmu); __activate_traps(vcpu); + __adjust_pc(vcpu);If the INCREMENT_PC flag was set (e.g., for WFx emulation) while we're handling PSCI CPU_ON call targetting this VCPU, the *target_pc* (aka entry point address, normally provided by the primary VCPU) will be unexpectedly incremented here. That's pretty bad, I think. This was noticed with a latest guest kernel, at least with commit dccc9da22ded ("arm64: Improve parking of stopped CPUs"), which put the stopped VCPUs in the WFx loop. The guest kernel shouted at me that "CPU: CPUs started in inconsistent modes" *after* rebooting. The problem is that the secondary entry point was corrupted by KVM as explained above. All of the secondary processors started from set_cpu_boot_mode_flag(), with w0=0. Oh well...
FWIW, I've pushed out a test branch[1] with two patches that sit on top of Linus' current tree. I'll rebase and post it as soon as -rc1 appears, but I'd appreciate if you could have a look in the meantime. Thanks, M. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=kvm-arm64/pc-fixes -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel