On Mon, 10 May 2021 10:46:48 +0200
Patrice CHOTARD [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

+
+	if (ctlr->mem_ops && ctlr->mem_ops->poll_status) {
+		ret = spi_mem_access_start(mem);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		reinit_completion(&ctlr->xfer_completion);
+
+		ret = ctlr->mem_ops->poll_status(mem, op, mask, match,
+						 timeout_ms);
+
+		ms = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctlr->xfer_completion,
+						 msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));  

Why do you need to wait here? I'd expect the poll_status to take care
of this wait.  

It was a request from Mark Brown [1]. The idea is to implement
similar mechanism already used in SPI framework.

Well, you have to choose, either you pass a timeout to ->poll_status()
and let the driver wait for the status change (and return -ETIMEDOUT if
it didn't happen in time), or you do it here and the driver only has to
signal the core completion object. I think it's preferable to let the
driver handle the timeout though, because you don't know how the
status check will be implemented, and it's not like the
reinit_completion()+wait_for_completion_timeout() done here would
greatly simplify the drivers wait logic anyway.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel