Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: change vmalloc_min to vmalloc_start
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-05-28 09:56:38
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:32:43PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2021, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
On Wed, 19 May 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:15 PM Russell King (Oracle) [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Change the current vmalloc_min, which is supposed to be the lowest address of vmalloc space including the VMALLOC_OFFSET, to vmalloc_start which does not include VMALLOC_OFFSET. Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <redacted>Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>quoted
+static unsigned long __initdata vmalloc_start = VMALLOC_END - (240 << 20);When I first read this it took me some time to figure out what was going on here, so if you have time, please fold in a comment with some explanation of that (240 << 20) thing, in some blog post I described it as "an interesting way to write 0x0f000000" but I suppose commit 0536bdf33faf chose this way for a specific reason? (Paging Nico if he can explain it.)That's an alternative (and deprecated) way to write MB(240).And it seems that MB() isn't globally defined either. Oh well.
I could add a patch on the end of the series changing it to 240 * SZ_1M which will likely be clearer. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel