Hi Geert,

On Wed, 26 May 2021 08:52:42 +0100,
Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Marc,

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:13 AM Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2021-05-11 10:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Jianyong Wu <redacted>

quoted

--- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig

@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
 config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
        tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
        depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
-       depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
+       depends on (KVM_GUEST && X86) || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY &&

ARM_ARCH_TIMER)

Why does this not depend on KVM_GUEST on ARM?
I.e. shouldn't the dependency be:

    KVM_GUEST && (X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER))

?

arm/arm64 do not select KVM_GUEST. Any kernel can be used for a guest,
and KVM/arm64 doesn't know about this configuration symbol.

OK.

Does PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM need to default to yes?
Perhaps only on X86, to maintain the status quo?

I think I don't really understand the problem you are trying to
solve. Is it that 'make oldconfig' now asks you about this new driver?
Why is that an issue?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel