Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 3 authors, 2021-05-27

Re: [PATCH v12 3/8] arm64: mte: Sync tags for pages where PTE is untagged

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2021-05-20 13:03:39
Also in: kvmarm, lkml, qemu-devel

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:25:50PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:55:21PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
quoted
The problem I hit is one of include dependencies:

is_swap_pte() is defined (as a static inline) in
include/linux/swapops.h. However the definition depends on
pte_none()/pte_present() which are defined in pgtable.h - so there's a
circular dependency.

Open coding is_swap_pte() in set_pte_at() works, but it's a bit ugly.
Any ideas on how to improve on the below?

	if (system_supports_mte() && pte_present(pte) &&
	    pte_access_permitted(pte, false) && !pte_special(pte)) {
		pte_t old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
		/*
		 * We only need to synchronise if the new PTE has tags enabled
		 * or if swapping in (in which case another mapping may have
		 * set tags in the past even if this PTE isn't tagged).
		 * (!pte_none() && !pte_present()) is an open coded version of
		 * is_swap_pte()
		 */
		if (pte_tagged(pte) || (!pte_none(pte) && !pte_present(pte)))
			mte_sync_tags(old_pte, pte);
	}
That's why I avoided testing my suggestion ;). I think we should just
add !pte_none() in there with a comment that it may be a swap pte and
use the is_swap_pte() again on the mte_sync_tags() path. We already have
the pte_present() check.
Correction - pte_present() checks the new pte only, we need another for
the old pte. So it looks like we'll open-code is_swap_pte().

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help