Re: [PATCH v12 3/8] arm64: mte: Sync tags for pages where PTE is untagged
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2021-05-20 13:03:39
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml, qemu-devel
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:25:50PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:55:21PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:quoted
The problem I hit is one of include dependencies: is_swap_pte() is defined (as a static inline) in include/linux/swapops.h. However the definition depends on pte_none()/pte_present() which are defined in pgtable.h - so there's a circular dependency. Open coding is_swap_pte() in set_pte_at() works, but it's a bit ugly. Any ideas on how to improve on the below? if (system_supports_mte() && pte_present(pte) && pte_access_permitted(pte, false) && !pte_special(pte)) { pte_t old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep); /* * We only need to synchronise if the new PTE has tags enabled * or if swapping in (in which case another mapping may have * set tags in the past even if this PTE isn't tagged). * (!pte_none() && !pte_present()) is an open coded version of * is_swap_pte() */ if (pte_tagged(pte) || (!pte_none(pte) && !pte_present(pte))) mte_sync_tags(old_pte, pte); }That's why I avoided testing my suggestion ;). I think we should just add !pte_none() in there with a comment that it may be a swap pte and use the is_swap_pte() again on the mte_sync_tags() path. We already have the pte_present() check.
Correction - pte_present() checks the new pte only, we need another for the old pte. So it looks like we'll open-code is_swap_pte(). -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel