From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Date: 2021-05-11 12:55:15
The older device property API is going to be removed.
Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Date: 2021-05-11 13:52:15
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Heikki Krogerus
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
The older device property API is going to be removed.
Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks!
I can take this through the ACPI tree if there are no objections.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Heikki Krogerus
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The older device property API is going to be removed.
Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus<heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks!
I can take this through the ACPI tree if there are no objections.
Since this is related to device property API refactor, I'm
fine with it.
Lorenzo, what's your position?
Thanks
Hanjun
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden> Date: 2021-05-14 10:39:21
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 03:55:28PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
The older device property API is going to be removed.
Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
Is this really fixing anything ? I am not sure I understand what you
would like to achieve with this tag.
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Date: 2021-05-14 13:13:39
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:39:12AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 03:55:28PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
quoted
The older device property API is going to be removed.
Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
Is this really fixing anything ? I am not sure I understand what you
would like to achieve with this tag.
Right now it's not possible to simply remove the old API because some
of the maintainers want to take care of the conversion themselves, but
at the same time I also do not want to see any new releases of the
kernel that introduce more users for it. That's why it's a fix.
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Date: 2021-05-17 14:45:01
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:13 PM Heikki Krogerus
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:39:12AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
quoted
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 03:55:28PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
quoted
The older device property API is going to be removed.
Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
Is this really fixing anything ? I am not sure I understand what you
would like to achieve with this tag.
Right now it's not possible to simply remove the old API because some
of the maintainers want to take care of the conversion themselves, but
at the same time I also do not want to see any new releases of the
kernel that introduce more users for it. That's why it's a fix.
With the assumption that the above clarification is sufficient,
applied as 5.14 material, thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel