Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 3 authors, 2021-05-12

Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] mfd: mt6360: Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resources into mt6360 regulator resources

From: Gene Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-11 12:14:48
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-pm, lkml

Lee Jones [off-list ref] 於 2021年3月23日 週二 下午5:38寫道:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2021, Gene Chen wrote:
quoted
Lee Jones [off-list ref] 於 2021年1月15日 週五 下午3:32寫道:
quoted
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021, Gene Chen wrote:
quoted
Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] 於 2021年1月12日 週二 下午8:32寫道:
quoted


On 12/11/2020 11:39, Gene Chen wrote:
quoted
From: Gene Chen <redacted>

Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resources into mt6360 regulator resources
to simplify the similar resources object.

Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <redacted>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones [off-list ref]
---
 drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
index 692e47b..5119e51 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static const struct resource mt6360_led_resources[] = {
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_FLED1_STRB_TO_EVT, "fled1_strb_to_evt"),
 };

-static const struct resource mt6360_pmic_resources[] = {
+static const struct resource mt6360_regulator_resources[] = {
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_BUCK1_PGB_EVT, "buck1_pgb_evt"),
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_BUCK1_OC_EVT, "buck1_oc_evt"),
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_BUCK1_OV_EVT, "buck1_ov_evt"),
@@ -278,9 +278,6 @@ static const struct resource mt6360_pmic_resources[] = {
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO7_OC_EVT, "ldo7_oc_evt"),
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO6_PGB_EVT, "ldo6_pgb_evt"),
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO7_PGB_EVT, "ldo7_pgb_evt"),
-};
-
-static const struct resource mt6360_ldo_resources[] = {
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO1_OC_EVT, "ldo1_oc_evt"),
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO2_OC_EVT, "ldo2_oc_evt"),
      DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO3_OC_EVT, "ldo3_oc_evt"),
@@ -298,10 +295,8 @@ static const struct mfd_cell mt6360_devs[] = {
                  NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-chg"),
      OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-led", mt6360_led_resources,
                  NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-led"),
-     OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-pmic", mt6360_pmic_resources,
-                 NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-pmic"),
-     OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-ldo", mt6360_ldo_resources,
-                 NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-ldo"),
+     OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-regulator", mt6360_regulator_resources,
+                 NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-regulator"),
As discussed with the MFD maintainer [1], the regulator (and probably all cells)
shouldn't have a DT binding.

So please send a new version which fixes that.

Regards,
Matthias

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20210111164118.GE4728@sirena.org.uk/ (local)
I don't think Mark is correct here.

We usually do implement compatible strings for sub-devices and they do
tend to have their own device nodes.

It's a very long time ago since I coded this up myself, but from
memory, you can't have 2 devices share a compatible string.
Either Mark or Lee suggestion is work.
Is there a conclusion that we can apply it?
If MFD is already supported of_compatible, we prefer use of_compatible mapping.
I would resubmit the set.  We can start afresh from there.
Dear Jones,

    Should I send fixed patch about adding regulator node directly can
make easier for you to re-submit new patch?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help