Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] mfd: mt6360: Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resources into mt6360 regulator resources
From: Gene Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-11 12:14:48
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-pm, lkml
Lee Jones [off-list ref] 於 2021年3月23日 週二 下午5:38寫道:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2021, Gene Chen wrote:quoted
Lee Jones [off-list ref] 於 2021年1月15日 週五 下午3:32寫道:quoted
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021, Gene Chen wrote:quoted
Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] 於 2021年1月12日 週二 下午8:32寫道:quoted
On 12/11/2020 11:39, Gene Chen wrote:quoted
From: Gene Chen <redacted> Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resources into mt6360 regulator resources to simplify the similar resources object. Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <redacted> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones [off-list ref] --- drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c index 692e47b..5119e51 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static const struct resource mt6360_led_resources[] = { DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_FLED1_STRB_TO_EVT, "fled1_strb_to_evt"), }; -static const struct resource mt6360_pmic_resources[] = { +static const struct resource mt6360_regulator_resources[] = { DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_BUCK1_PGB_EVT, "buck1_pgb_evt"), DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_BUCK1_OC_EVT, "buck1_oc_evt"), DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_BUCK1_OV_EVT, "buck1_ov_evt"),@@ -278,9 +278,6 @@ static const struct resource mt6360_pmic_resources[] = { DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO7_OC_EVT, "ldo7_oc_evt"), DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO6_PGB_EVT, "ldo6_pgb_evt"), DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO7_PGB_EVT, "ldo7_pgb_evt"), -}; - -static const struct resource mt6360_ldo_resources[] = { DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO1_OC_EVT, "ldo1_oc_evt"), DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO2_OC_EVT, "ldo2_oc_evt"), DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MT6360_LDO3_OC_EVT, "ldo3_oc_evt"),@@ -298,10 +295,8 @@ static const struct mfd_cell mt6360_devs[] = { NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-chg"), OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-led", mt6360_led_resources, NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-led"), - OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-pmic", mt6360_pmic_resources, - NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-pmic"), - OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-ldo", mt6360_ldo_resources, - NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-ldo"), + OF_MFD_CELL("mt6360-regulator", mt6360_regulator_resources, + NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-regulator"),As discussed with the MFD maintainer [1], the regulator (and probably all cells) shouldn't have a DT binding. So please send a new version which fixes that. Regards, Matthias [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20210111164118.GE4728@sirena.org.uk/ (local)I don't think Mark is correct here. We usually do implement compatible strings for sub-devices and they do tend to have their own device nodes. It's a very long time ago since I coded this up myself, but from memory, you can't have 2 devices share a compatible string.Either Mark or Lee suggestion is work. Is there a conclusion that we can apply it? If MFD is already supported of_compatible, we prefer use of_compatible mapping.I would resubmit the set. We can start afresh from there.
Dear Jones,
Should I send fixed patch about adding regulator node directly can
make easier for you to re-submit new patch?
-- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel