Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-18

Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: stm32mp1: Split ETHCK_K into separate MUX and GATE clock

From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Date: 2021-04-16 15:23:28
Also in: linux-clk


On 4/16/21 3:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 4/16/21 8:44 AM, gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com wrote:
quoted
Hi Marek
Hello Gabriel,
quoted
On 4/14/21 4:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
quoted
On 4/14/21 3:03 PM, gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com wrote:
quoted
Hi Marek,
Hello Gabriel,
quoted
Thanks for the patchset

On 4/8/21 8:57 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
quoted
The ETHCK_K are modeled as composite clock of MUX and GATE, however 
per
STM32MP1 Reference Manual RM0436 Rev 3, Page 574, Figure 83. 
Peripheral
clock distribution for Ethernet, ETHPTPDIV divider is attached past 
the
ETHCK_K mux, and ETH_CLK/eth_clk_fb clock are output past ETHCKEN 
gate.
Therefore, in case ETH_CLK/eth_clk_fb are not in use AND PTP clock are
in use, ETHCKEN gate can be turned off. Current driver does not permit
that, fix it.
I don"t understand, it's already the case.

ETHCK_K it's a composite with a MUX and a GATE.
But ETHCK_K is _not_ a composite clock, look at the Figure 83 in the 
datasheet again and schematic below.
quoted
ETHPTP_K (ETHPTPDIV) it's a composite with the same MUX and a DIV 
(no gate)
But ETHPTP_K shouldn't control any mux, it is only a divider.
quoted
If you use only ETHPTPDIV,  ETHCKEN gate can be turned off.
Look, this is what you have today:

            .------------ ETHCK_K -----------.
            |_______               _______   |
pll4_p_ck--|M_ETHCK\             |G_ETHCK\  |
            | MUX    |------+-----| GATE   |-------------[x] ETH_CLK
pll3_q_ck--|_______/       |     |_______/                  eth_clk_fb
            |               |
            |               '--(ETHCKSELR[7:4] divider)--[x] clk_ptp_ref
            |                                          |
            '------------ ETHPTP_K --------------------'

And this is what you should have, to avoid having two composite clock 
which control the same mux using the same register bit, i.e. what 
this patch implements:

            .- ck_ker_eth -.  .--- ETHCK_K --.
            |_______       |  |    _______   |
pll4_p_ck--|M_ETHCK\      |  |   |G_ETHCK\  |
            | MUX    |------+-----| GATE   |-------------[x] ETH_CLK
pll3_q_ck--|_______/       |     |_______/                  eth_clk_fb
                            |
                            '--(ETHCKSELR[7:4] divider)--[x] clk_ptp_ref
                             |                         |
                             '---- ETHPTP_K -----------'
These 2 solutions are valid. I made the choice to implement the first 
one to be able to change parent with the kernel clock of the IP (no 
need to add an intermediate binding).
Which IP are you talking about in here ?
quoted
It's the same principle for all kernel of this soc.
The first option is wrong, because in that model, you have two composite 
clock which control the same one mux bit in the same register. Basically 
you register two distinct clock which operate the same hardware knob.
quoted
I can ask to Alexandre to comeback of this principle, but i 'm not 
favorable.
The only discussing thing is how the clock is shown. I mean either two 
composites or one mux plus two gates. Gabriel made a choice to abstract 
the mux in two composite clocks. But it seems that at the end we have 
the same behaviour, isn't ?

Adding "ck_ker_eth" would impose a new clock to take in DT ?

regards
alex
Please ask.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
This patch converts ETHCK_K from composite clock into a ETHCKEN gate,
ETHPTP_K from composite clock into ETHPTPDIV divider, and adds another
NO_ID clock "ck_ker_eth" which models the ETHSRC mux and is parent 
clock
to both ETHCK_K and ETHPTP_K. Therefore, all references to ETHCK_K and
ETHPTP_K remain functional as before.

[1] STM32MP1 Reference Manual RM0436 Rev 3, Page 574,
     Figure 83. Peripheral clock distribution for Ethernet
https://www.st.com/resource/en/reference_manual/dm00327659-stm32mp157-advanced-armbased-32bit-mpus-stmicroelectronics.pdf 
[...]
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32mp1.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32mp1.c
index a875649df8b8..a7c7f544ee5d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32mp1.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32mp1.c
@@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static const struct clock_config 
stm32mp1_clock_cfg[] = {
      KCLK(DSI_K, "dsi_k", dsi_src, 0, G_DSI, M_DSI),
      KCLK(ADFSDM_K, "adfsdm_k", sai_src, 0, G_ADFSDM, M_SAI1),
      KCLK(USBO_K, "usbo_k", usbo_src, 0, G_USBO, M_USBO),
-    KCLK(ETHCK_K, "ethck_k", eth_src, 0, G_ETHCK, M_ETHCK),
      /* Particulary Kernel Clocks (no mux or no gate) */
      MGATE_MP1(DFSDM_K, "dfsdm_k", "ck_mcu", 0, G_DFSDM),
@@ -1958,11 +1957,16 @@ static const struct clock_config 
stm32mp1_clock_cfg[] = {
      MGATE_MP1(GPU_K, "gpu_k", "pll2_q", 0, G_GPU),
      MGATE_MP1(DAC12_K, "dac12_k", "ck_lsi", 0, G_DAC12),
-    COMPOSITE(ETHPTP_K, "ethptp_k", eth_src, CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE |
+    COMPOSITE(NO_ID, "ck_ker_eth", eth_src, CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE |
            CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
            _NO_GATE,
            _MMUX(M_ETHCK),
-          _DIV(RCC_ETHCKSELR, 4, 4, 0, NULL)),
+          _NO_DIV),
+
+    MGATE_MP1(ETHCK_K, "ethck_k", "ck_ker_eth", 0, G_ETHCK),
assigned parent with ETHCK_K will not work
quoted
+
+    DIV(ETHPTP_K, "ethptp_k", "ck_ker_eth", CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE |
CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE flags not useful with a divider.
How so ?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help