Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid()
From: Kefeng Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-22 07:00:28
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-mm, lkml
On 2021/4/21 14:51, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport <redacted> Hi, These patches aim to remove CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and essentially hardwire pfn_valid_within() to 1. The idea is to mark NOMAP pages as reserved in the memory map and restore the intended semantics of pfn_valid() to designate availability of struct page for a pfn. With this the core mm will be able to cope with the fact that it cannot use NOMAP pages and the holes created by NOMAP ranges within MAX_ORDER blocks will be treated correctly even without the need for pfn_valid_within. The patches are only boot tested on qemu-system-aarch64 so I'd really appreciate memory stress tests on real hardware. If this actually works we'll be one step closer to drop custom pfn_valid() on arm64 altogether.
Hi Mike,I have a question, without HOLES_IN_ZONE, the pfn_valid_within() in move_freepages_block()->move_freepages() will be optimized, if there are holes in zone, the 'struce page'(memory map) for pfn range of hole will be free by free_memmap(), and then the page traverse in the zone(with holes) from move_freepages() will meet the wrong page, then it could panic at PageLRU(page) test, check link[1], "The idea is to mark NOMAP pages as reserved in the memory map", I see the patch2 check memblock_is_nomap() in memory region of memblock, but it seems that memblock_mark_nomap() is not called(maybe I missed), then memmap_init_reserved_pages() won't work, so should the HOLES_IN_ZONE still be needed for generic mm code? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/541193a6-2bce-f042-5bb2-88913d5f1047@arm.com/ (local) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel