Hello!

On Tuesday 20 April 2021 14:17:21 Jianjun Wang wrote:

+static void mtk_pcie_enable_msi(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
+{
+	int i;
+	u32 val;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < PCIE_MSI_SET_NUM; i++) {
+		struct mtk_msi_set *msi_set = &port->msi_sets[i];
+
+		msi_set->base = port->base + PCIE_MSI_SET_BASE_REG +
+				i * PCIE_MSI_SET_OFFSET;
+		msi_set->msg_addr = port->reg_base + PCIE_MSI_SET_BASE_REG +
+				    i * PCIE_MSI_SET_OFFSET;
+
+		/* Configure the MSI capture address */
+		writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr), msi_set->base);
+		writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr),
+			       port->base + PCIE_MSI_SET_ADDR_HI_BASE +
+			       i * PCIE_MSI_SET_ADDR_HI_OFFSET);

This looks like as setting MSI doorbell address to MSI doorbell address.

+static void mtk_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct mtk_msi_set *msi_set = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = data->domain->host_data;
+	unsigned long hwirq;
+
+	hwirq =	data->hwirq % PCIE_MSI_IRQS_PER_SET;
+
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr);
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr);
+	msg->data = hwirq;
+	dev_dbg(port->dev, "msi#%#lx address_hi %#x address_lo %#x data %d\n",
+		hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo, msg->data);

... which is later used in compose_msi_msg().

Marc in some other patches for other pci controller drivers changed this
address to just main "port" structure. It simplified implementations and
also avoided need to declare additional member "msg_addr".

Marc, would it be possible to simplify it also for this driver and just
set msg_addr to virt_to_phys(port)?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel