Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] drivers/gpu/drm: don't select DMA_CMA or CMA from aspeed or etnaviv
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-08 12:01:29
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-aspeed, linux-fbdev, linux-mm, lkml
On 08.04.21 13:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:00 PM David Hildenbrand [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
It is a somewhat awkward way to say "prevent this symbol from being =y if the dependency is =m".What would be the right thing to do in the case here then to achieve the "if DRMA_ASPEED_GFX is enabled, also enable DMA_CMA id possible"? One approach could be to have for DMA_CMA default y if DRMA_ASPEED_GFX but it feels like the wrong way to tackle this.I'm still not sure what you are trying to achieve. Is the idea only to provide a useful default for DMA_CMA depending on which drivers are enabled?
"Random drivers should not override a user configuration of core knobs (e.g., CONFIG_DMA_CMA=n)." Let's assume I'm a distribution and want to set CONFIG_CMA=n or want to set CONFIG_DMA_CMA=n with CONFIG_CMA=y; there is no way to do that with e.g., DRMA_ASPEED_GFX=y because it will always override my (user!) setting -- even though it doesn't really always need it. Using "select" is the problem here.
This is something you could do using a hidden helper symbol like
config DRMA_ASPEED_GFX
bool "Aspeed display driver"
select DRM_WANT_CMA
config DRM_WANT_CMA
bool
help
Select this from any driver that benefits from CMA being enabled
config DMA_CMA
bool "Use CMA helpers for DRM"
default DRM_WANT_CMA
ArndThat's precisely what I had first, with an additional "WANT_CMA" -- but looking at the number of such existing options (I was able to spot 1 !) I wondered if there is a better approach to achieve the same; "imply" sounded like a good candidate. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel