Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 5 authors, 2021-04-06

Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] arm64: implement function_nocfi

From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Date: 2021-04-06 17:03:12
Also in: bpf, linux-arch, linux-hardening, linux-kbuild, linux-pci, lkml

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:37 AM Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:32:10PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
quoted
With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function addresses in
instrumented C code with jump table addresses. This change implements
the function_nocfi() macro, which returns the actual function address
instead.

Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
I think that it's unfortunate that we have to drop to assembly here, but
given this is infrequent I agree it's not the end of the world, so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
quoted
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
index 0aabc3be9a75..b55410afd3d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
@@ -321,6 +321,21 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
 #define virt_to_pfn(x)               __phys_to_pfn(__virt_to_phys((unsigned long)(x)))
 #define sym_to_pfn(x)                __phys_to_pfn(__pa_symbol(x))

+#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
+/*
+ * With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address
+ * references with the address of the function's CFI jump table
+ * entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the
+ * actual function instead.
+ */
+#define function_nocfi(x) ({                                         \
+     void *addr;                                                     \
+     asm("adrp %0, " __stringify(x) "\n\t"                           \
+         "add  %0, %0, :lo12:" __stringify(x) : "=r" (addr));        \
If it's not too painful, could we please move the asm constrain onto its
own line? That makes it slightly easier to read, and aligns with what
we've (mostly) done elsewhere in arm64.
Sure, I'll change this in the next version.
Not a big deal either way, and the ack stands regardless.

Thanks,
Mark.
Sami

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help