Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Cope with CPUs stuck in VHE mode
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-26 11:21:54
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:33:19 +0000, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:47:21PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
It seems that the CPUs part of the SoC known as Apple M1 have the terrible habit of being stuck with HCR_EL2.E2H==1, in violation of the architecture. Try and work around this deplorable state of affairs by detecting the stuck bit early and short-circuit the nVHE dance. Additional filtering code ensures that attempts at switching to nVHE from the command-line are also ignored. It is still unknown whether there are many more such nuggets to be found... Reported-by: Hector Martin <redacted> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S | 15 ++++++++++---- arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c | 13 +++++++++++- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S index 840bda1869e9..db2de5b8f3d9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S@@ -477,14 +477,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kimage_vaddr) * booted in EL1 or EL2 respectively. */ SYM_FUNC_START(init_kernel_el) - mov_q x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF - msr sctlr_el1, x0 - mrs x0, CurrentEL cmp x0, #CurrentEL_EL2 b.eq init_el2 SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el1, SYM_L_LOCAL) + mov_q x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF + msr sctlr_el1, x0 isb mov_q x0, INIT_PSTATE_EL1 msr spsr_el1, x0@@ -504,6 +503,34 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL) msr vbar_el2, x0 isb + /* + * Fruity CPUs seem to have HCR_EL2.E2H set to RES1, + * making it impossible to start in nVHE mode. Is that + * compliant with the architecture? Absolutely not! + */ + mrs x0, hcr_el2 + and x0, x0, #HCR_E2H + cbz x0, 1f + + /* Switching to VHE requires a sane SCTLR_EL1 as a start */ + mov_q x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF + msr_s SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x0 + + /* + * Force an eret into a helper "function", and let it return + * to our original caller... This makes sure that we have + * initialised the basic PSTATE state. + */ + mov x0, #INIT_PSTATE_EL2 + msr spsr_el1, x0 + adr_l x0, stick_to_vhe + msr elr_el1, x0 + eretWhat does this do if CONFIG_VHE=n on one of these CPUs?
Interesting question. With this patch, it will actually boot, and behave just fine as long as you don't run a guest (the percpu offset being stored in TPIDR_EL1 will then be corrupted, though you may not even get there because of the sysreg renaming being unexpectedly active). I guess I could either make this code conditional on CONFIG_ARM64_VHE and let the machine crash early without a word, or have some later checks once the machine started booting. In the later case, displaying anything useful is going to be a challenge though (the odds of someone having a serial console on this box are close to nil). Pick your poison. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel