Re: CAAM: kernel BUG at drivers/crypto/caam/jr.c:230! (and dma-coherent query)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2021-03-04 17:04:52
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-iommu
On 2021-03-03 16:40, Horia Geantă wrote:
On 3/3/2021 4:57 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 12:26:32PM +0200, Horia Geantă wrote:quoted
Adding some people in the loop, maybe they could help in understanding why lack of "dma-coherent" property for a HW-coherent device could lead to unexpected / strange side effects. On 3/1/2021 5:22 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:quoted
Hi All, I am on a Layerscape LS1046a using Linux-5.11. The CAAM driver sometimes crashes during the run-time self tests with:quoted
kernel BUG at drivers/crypto/caam/jr.c:247! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.11.0-20210225-3-00039-g434215968816-dirty #12 Hardware name: TQ TQMLS1046A SoM on Arkona AT1130 (C300) board (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) pc : caam_jr_dequeue+0x98/0x57c lr : caam_jr_dequeue+0x98/0x57c sp : ffff800010003d50 x29: ffff800010003d50 x28: ffff8000118d4000 x27: ffff8000118d4328 x26: 00000000000001f0 x25: ffff0008022be480 x24: ffff0008022c6410 x23: 00000000000001f1 x22: ffff8000118d4329 x21: 0000000000004d80 x20: 00000000000001f1 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000020 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000015 x15: ffff800011690230 x14: 2e2e2e2e2e2e2e2e x13: 2e2e2e2e2e2e2020 x12: 3030303030303030 x11: ffff800011700a38 x10: 00000000fffff000 x9 : ffff8000100ada30 x8 : ffff8000116a8a38 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000001800 Call trace: caam_jr_dequeue+0x98/0x57c tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x164/0x18c tasklet_action+0x44/0x54 __do_softirq+0x160/0x454 __irq_exit_rcu+0x164/0x16c irq_exit+0x1c/0x30 __handle_domain_irq+0xc0/0x13c gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xf0 el1_irq+0xb4/0x180 arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x30 default_idle_call+0x3c/0x1c0 do_idle+0x23c/0x274 cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x70 rest_init+0xdc/0xec arch_call_rest_init+0x1c/0x28 start_kernel+0x4ac/0x4e4 Code: 91392021 912c2000 d377d8c6 97f24d96 (d4210000)The driver iterates over the descriptors in the output ring and matches them with the ones it has previously queued. If it doesn't find a matching descriptor it complains with the BUG_ON() seen above. What I see sometimes is that the address in the output ring is 0x0, the job status in this case is 0x40000006 (meaning DECO Invalid KEY command). It seems that the CAAM doesn't write the descriptor address to the output ring at least in some error cases. When we don't have the descriptor address of the failed descriptor we have no way to find it in the list of queued descriptors, thus we also can't find the callback for that descriptor. This looks very unfortunate, anyone else seen this or has an idea what to do about it? I haven't investigated yet which job actually fails and why. Of course that would be my ultimate goal to find that out.This looks very similar to an earlier report from Greg. He confirmed that adding "dma-coherent" property to the "crypto" DT node fixes the issue: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/74f664f5-5433-d322-4789-3c78bdb814d8@kernel.org (local) Patch rebased on v5.11 is at the bottom. Does it work for you too?Indeed this seems to solve it for me as well, you can add my Tested-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>Thanks! I'll append the tag to the formally submitted patch.quoted
However, there seem to be two problems: First that "DECO Invalid KEY command" actually occurs and second that the deqeueue code currently can't handle a NULL pointer in the output ring.Currently the dequeue code BUGs not only for "NULL pointer", but for any IOVA in the output ring that is not matched with an entry in the "shadow" (SW) ring. Here the BUG_ON() should be replaced with WARN_ON since not finding a match means driver can't go to the "SW context" and eventually call complete() to wake up the crypto API user. In many cases the user relies on crypto_wait_req(), which does not time out and is not killable.quoted
Do you think that the occurence of a NULL pointer is also a coherency issue?I strongly believe there's a single problem because the issue goes away when the patch is applied, even though I haven't figured out what is the exact place / data structure that gets corrupted. One theory is that corruption occurs in the input ring: -CPU sets up correctly the input ring entry -device doesn't see the "fresh" data, reading 0x0 for the descriptor address -device reads the descriptor commands from address 0x0 and issues "DECO invalid KEY command" (note that KEY command opcode is b'00000, so reading all zeros from address 0x0 would lead to this error) But then the input & output rings are allocated using dma_alloc_coherent(), so I'll need to check if lack of "dma-coherent" DT property has the same effect on consistent DMA mappings as on streaming DMA mappings.
It certainly can, at least on arm64 where coherent buffers are remapped in vmalloc rather than changing the linear map attributes in-place. In that case the dma_alloc_coherent() flow looks like this: 1: clean and invalidate pages by (cacheable) linear map address 2: set up non-cacheable remap 3: write zeros via non-cacheable mapping ... 4: CPU writes descriptor via non-cacheable mapping ... 5: device reads descriptor If the cacheable alias is prefetched back in between steps 1 and 4 (e.g. from another thread accessing an adjacent page by linear map address), the CPU writes will (usually) still bypass the caches and go straight to DRAM, so if the device read unexpectedly snoops it can return the older data from the cache. This will normally be the zeros from step 3, unless you're extremely unlucky and the prefetch happened even before that. As I mentioned, this is exactly what we were hitting with Panfrost where GPU coherency wasn't described. Robin. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel