On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 09:35:43AM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 07:45:23PM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:01 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:59:02PM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
quoted
From: Chuanhong Guo <redacted>
mt7621 has the following memory map:
0x0-0x1c000000: lower 448m memory
0x1c000000-0x2000000: peripheral registers
0x20000000-0x2400000: higher 64m memory
detect_memory_region in arch/mips/kernel/setup.c only adds the first
memory region and isn't suitable for 512m memory detection because
it may accidentally read the memory area for peripheral registers.
This commit adds memory detection capability for mt7621:
1. Add the highmem area when 512m is detected.
2. Guard memcmp from accessing peripheral registers:
This only happens when a user decided to change kernel load address
to 256m or higher address. Since this is a quite unusual case, we
just skip 512m testing and return 256m as memory size.
[...]
I get
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x132c): Section mismatch in reference from the function prom_soc_init() to the function .init.text:mt7621_memory_detect()
The function prom_soc_init() references
the function __init mt7621_memory_detect().
This is often because prom_soc_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of mt7621_memory_detect is wrong.
Can you please fix this ?
Thanks, I will fix it. Having trouble reproducing the error, but I
clearly see the issue. Are you building on a MIPS target or
cross-compiling (I'm cross-compiling and no errors).
I'm cross compiling, I can provide you the .config, if you want.
Yeah, that would help. I spent quite a bit of time trying to reproduce
- tried different options with GCC 8 and GCC 10 to no avail. Maybe you
are using clang?
no, but an older gcc (gcc version 6.1.1 20160621 (Red Hat Cross 6.1.1-2) (GCC)).
config is attached.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]