Hi,

On 3/23/21 3:11 PM, Aisheng Dong wrote:

quoted

From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:11 PM

Hi,

On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:

quoted

Hi Chanwoo,

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng [off-list ref]

wrote:

quoted

quoted

A few small fixes and improvements

ChangeLog:
v1->v2:
 * squash a few patches
 * rebase to devfreq-testing

I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because
below two patches only exist in devfreq-testing.
5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add
devfreq_transitions debugfs file
dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential
sysfs attrs My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your
suggestion. So i have to rebase to that branch.

However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled.
Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply.

Please help take a look at this new series.

Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git Because
devfreq-testing branch is not official.

Okay, then how about the patch 5 below?
[PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq

Should I also rebase it to devfreq-next or drop it first and then resend when your patch
merged into mainline?

Yes. Thanks.

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel