Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 3 authors, 2021-04-21

Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/timer-mediatek: optimize systimer irq clear flow on Mediatek Socs

From: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Date: 2021-03-23 00:50:17
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:07 AM Fengquan Chen
[off-list ref] wrote:
1)ensure systimer is enabled before clear and disable interrupt, which only
for systimer in Mediatek Socs.
Why does the timer need to be enabled before the interrupt can be
disabled? The datasheet I have does not suggest that this is required.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
2)clear any pending timer-irq when shutdown to keep suspend flow clean,
when use systimer as tick-broadcast timer

Change-Id: Ia3eda83324af2fdaf5cbb3569a9bf020a11f8009
Signed-off-by: Fengquan Chen <redacted>
---
 drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
index 9318edc..9f1f095dc 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
 static void mtk_syst_ack_irq(struct timer_of *to)
This function seems to be mis-named. It does more than just ack the irq.
 {
        /* Clear and disable interrupt */
+       writel(SYST_CON_EN, SYST_CON_REG(to));
This line seems to enable the timer and disable the interrupt.
        writel(SYST_CON_IRQ_CLR | SYST_CON_EN, SYST_CON_REG(to));
This line acks the interrupt and enables the timer and disables the interrupt.
Are these lines both necessary?
Maybe this function should just ack the interrupt without changing the
other bits.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 }
@@ -111,6 +112,9 @@ static int mtk_syst_clkevt_next_event(unsigned long ticks,

 static int mtk_syst_clkevt_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *clkevt)
 {
+       /* Clear any irq */
+       mtk_syst_ack_irq(to_timer_of(clkevt));
+
        /* Disable timer */
        writel(0, SYST_CON_REG(to_timer_of(clkevt)));
This is a third write to the same register, I believe all 3 writes can
be combined into 1. Is that possible?
--
1.8.1.1.dirty
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help