Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] arm64: don't use GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-03-15 19:29:29
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:56:25AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> In subsequent patches we want to allow irqchip drivers to register as FIQ handlers, with a set_handle_fiq() function. To keep the IRQ/FIQ paths similar, we want arm64 to provide both set_handle_irq() and set_handle_fiq(), rather than using GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER for the former.
Having looked through the series I do not understand this rationale at all. You've only added the default_handle_irq logic, which seems perfectly suitable and desirable for the generic version. Please don't fork off generic code for no good reason. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel