Thread (23 messages) flat view 23 messages, 4 authors, 2021-03-11

Re: [PATCH v7 12/17] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table when stopping

From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Date: 2021-03-11 09:15:26
Also in: linux-remoteproc, lkml


On 3/11/21 12:53 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Wed 10 Mar 15:10 CST 2021, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
quoted
When a remote processor that was attached to is stopped, special care
must be taken to make sure the shutdown process is similar to what
it would be had it been started by the remoteproc core.

This patch takes care of that by making a copy of the resource
table currently used by the remote processor.  From that point on
the copy is used, as if the remote processor had been started by
the remoteproc core.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V7:
  New Patch, used to be part of 11/16 in V6.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e9ea2558432d..c488b1aa6119 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1634,6 +1634,52 @@ static int rproc_reset_rsc_table_on_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rproc_reset_rsc_table_on_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
+
+	/* A resource table was never retrieved, nothing to do here */
+	if (!rproc->table_ptr)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * If a cache table exists the remote processor was started by
+	 * the remoteproc core.  That cache table should be used for
+	 * the rest of the shutdown process.
+	 */
+	if (rproc->cached_table)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Remember where the external entity installed the resource table */
+	table_ptr = rproc->table_ptr;
+
Afaict this is just a remnant from the detach case.

I think the series looks really good now, please let me know and I can
drop the local "table_ptr" as I apply the patches.
Just a minor comment on patch 11, then the series LGTM also,

For this one
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <redacted>

Thanks,
Arnaud
Regards,
Bjorn
quoted
+	/*
+	 * If we made it here the remote processor was started by another
+	 * entity and a cache table doesn't exist.  As such make a copy of
+	 * the resource table currently used by the remote processor and
+	 * use that for the rest of the shutdown process.  The memory
+	 * allocated here is free'd in rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	rproc->cached_table = kmemdup(rproc->table_ptr,
+				      rproc->table_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rproc->cached_table)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since the remote processor is being switched off the clean table
+	 * won't be needed.  Allocated in rproc_set_rsc_table().
+	 */
+	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
+
+out:
+	/*
+	 * Use a copy of the resource table for the remainder of the
+	 * shutdown process.
+	 */
+	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
@@ -1759,7 +1805,12 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 	rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, crashed);
 
 	/* the installed resource table is no longer accessible */
-	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
+	ret = rproc_reset_rsc_table_on_stop(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't reset resource table: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 
 	/* power off the remote processor */
 	ret = rproc->ops->stop(rproc);
-- 
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help