Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback

On 09-03-21, 15:11, Ionela Voinescu wrote:

On Monday 01 Mar 2021 at 12:21:17 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
index 0f6cd6b73a61..3bcfba5c21a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h

@@ -34,7 +34,19 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq,
 			     unsigned long max_freq);
 bool topology_scale_freq_invariant(void);

We don't normally add blank lines between declarations (variables or
function), like what's done here.

quoted

 
-bool arch_freq_counters_available(const struct cpumask *cpus);
+enum scale_freq_source {
+	SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPUFREQ = 0,
+	SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH,
+};
+
+struct scale_freq_data {
+	enum scale_freq_source source;
+	void (*set_freq_scale)(void);
+};
+
+void topology_scale_freq_tick(void);
+void topology_set_scale_freq_source(struct scale_freq_data *data, const struct cpumask *cpus);
+void topology_clear_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source, const struct cpumask *cpus);

Nit: can you split these lines?

And so in order to be consistent across the file, I haven't added one
here.

-- 
viresh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel