Thread (72 messages) 72 messages, 2 authors, 2021-02-24

Re: [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers

From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Date: 2021-02-18 12:11:35
Also in: kvm, kvmarm

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:41:20 +0000
Alexandru Elisei [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,
On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
quoted
Now that the PC keyboard has a trap handler adhering to the MMIO fault
handler prototype, let's switch over to the joint registration routine.

This allows us to get rid of the ioport shim routines.

Make the kbd_init() function static on the way.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 hw/i8042.c          | 30 ++++--------------------------
 include/kvm/i8042.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i8042.c b/hw/i8042.c
index eb1f9d28..91d79dc4 100644
--- a/hw/i8042.c
+++ b/hw/i8042.c
@@ -325,40 +325,18 @@ static void kbd_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
 		ioport__write8(data, value);
 }
 
-/*
- * Called when the OS has written to one of the keyboard's ports (0x60 or 0x64)
- */
-static bool kbd_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
-{
-	kbd_io(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL);
-
-	return true;
-}
-
-static bool kbd_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
-{
-	kbd_io(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL);
-
-	return true;
-}
-
-static struct ioport_operations kbd_ops = {
-	.io_in		= kbd_in,
-	.io_out		= kbd_out,
-};
-
-int kbd__init(struct kvm *kvm)
+static int kbd__init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	int r;
 
 	kbd_reset();
 	state.kvm = kvm;
-	r = ioport__register(kvm, I8042_DATA_REG, &kbd_ops, 2, NULL);
+	r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, I8042_DATA_REG, 2, kbd_io, NULL);  
I guess you are registering two addresses here to cover I8042_PORT_B_REG, right?
Might be worth a comment.
I am registering two ports because the original code did, and I didn't
dare to touch this. I guess we put this on the wishlist for the device
emulation fixup series? ;-)

Maybe the intention was to just *reserve* those ports?
quoted
 	if (r < 0)
 		return r;
-	r = ioport__register(kvm, I8042_COMMAND_REG, &kbd_ops, 2, NULL);
+	r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, I8042_COMMAND_REG, 2, kbd_io, NULL);  
Shouldn't length be 1? The emulation should work only for address 0x64
(command/status register), right? Or am I missing something?
I don't think you are, same as above. Maybe some weird guest is using
half-word accesses (outw)?

Cheers,
Andre

Thanks,

Alex
quoted
 	if (r < 0) {
-		ioport__unregister(kvm, I8042_DATA_REG);
+		kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, I8042_DATA_REG);
 		return r;
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/kvm/i8042.h b/include/kvm/i8042.h
index 3b4ab688..cd4ae6bb 100644
--- a/include/kvm/i8042.h
+++ b/include/kvm/i8042.h
@@ -7,6 +7,5 @@ struct kvm;
 
 void mouse_queue(u8 c);
 void kbd_queue(u8 c);
-int kbd__init(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 #endif  

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help