Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-15 08:50:59
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-omap, linux-renesas-soc, linux-tegra, lkml, openbmc
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:00:42PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
Quoting Andrew Lunn (2021-02-13 08:04:34)quoted
quoted
I'm trying to see if we can make lives better for everyone by exposing the warnings by default in the drivers/clk/ directory now that there are supposedly none left. Shouldn't we tighten the screws now that we've cleaned them?Do you use patchwork? netdev has a bot attached which applies the patch and does a W=1 build, and will report any new warnings. But it does not email the developer, as far as i know. It is up to you as the maintainer to reject the patch and say why.Yes the kernel.org patchwork instance is used but I don't see any bot putting test results there. How is that done? https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/list/Compare this with for example: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210213175257.28642-1-ap420073@gmail.com/
Oh, that's nice.
Jakub can explain how he added these checks.
Yes, please share. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel