On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:00:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:51:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

Hi Saravana,

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)

quoted

Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
no longer boot without this patch.

Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?

Yes.

Have all issues been identified and understood?
Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
Have all fixes entered linux-next?
Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?

This can never be true for these types of per platform issues. There are 
folks that test linux-next Then there are ones that test rc1. And 
(unfortunately) so-on ending at testing only LTS releases.

quoted

We're already at v5.11-rc7.
Yes, we can get fixes into v5.12-rc7. Or v5.12-rc9...

Yeah, I'm leaning toward not making it the default for 5.12-rc1 because
not everything seems to be working, let's see how the rest of the week
goes...

I think there's some value waiting until after rc1 to turn off if just 
to find a few more issues.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel