Re: [PATCH 11/18] arm64: Kconfig: Require FIQ support for ARCH_APPLE
From: Hector Martin 'marcan' <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-07 09:24:41
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Hector Martin 'marcan' <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-07 09:24:41
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 07/02/2021 00.46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
config ARCH_APPLE bool "Apple Silicon SoC family" select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP + select ARM64_FIQ_SUPPORTAh, this is what I was expecting in the previous patch. I guess the initial ARCH_APPLE patch could be moved down the line and add all the dependencies in one go.
I was trying to introduce the Kconfig before the code that depends on it; is it kosher to have it in the other order, looking for CONFIG_ defines that don't exist yet? Though in this case the only user earlier in the series is the Samsung stuff, which doesn't care about FIQs, so I can just sort things as FIQ->ARCH_APPLE->samsung->AIC... I'm not sure about AIC vs. ARCH_APPLE though. Right now the pattern is that AIC depends on ARCH_APPLE and also defaults to that. But then you can build with ARCH_APPLE and AIC disabled if you so choose, which does result in a broken system on these machines. AIC should build without ARCH_APPLE (as long as we're on ARM64), so we could reverse that. -- Hector Martin "marcan" (marcan@marcan.st) Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel