Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftest/arm64/ptrace: add tests for PTRACE_O_ARM64_RAW_REGS
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-04 15:46:42
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
[+Kees] On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:40:12AM -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
Test output: TAP version 13 1..2 # selftests: arm64/ptrace: ptrace_syscall_raw_regs_test # 1..2 # ok 1 x7: 686920776f726c64 # ok 2 The child exited with code 0. # # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 ok 1 selftests: arm64/ptrace: ptrace_syscall_raw_regs_test # selftests: arm64/ptrace: ptrace_syscall_regs_test # 1..3 # ok 1 x7: 0 # ok 2 x7: 1 # ok 3 The child exited with code 0. # # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 ok 2 selftests: arm64/ptrace: ptrace_syscall_regs_test Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <redacted> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/ptrace/Makefile | 6 + .../ptrace/ptrace_syscall_raw_regs_test.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++ .../arm64/ptrace/ptrace_syscall_regs_test.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/ptrace/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/ptrace/ptrace_syscall_raw_regs_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/ptrace/ptrace_syscall_regs_test.c
Thanks for the tests! We already have a pretty extensive set of syscall entry tests in tools/testing/selftests/seccomp, so perhaps this would be better off as part of that? Maybe worth a look. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel