Re: [PATCH V3 04/14] coresight: ete: Add support for ETE sysreg access
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: 2021-02-03 15:53:52
Also in:
lkml
On 2/2/21 5:52 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:25:28PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:quoted
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Add support for handling the system registers for Embedded Trace Extensions (ETE). ETE shares most of the registers with ETMv4 except for some and also adds some new registers. Re-arrange the ETMv4x list to share the common definitions and add the ETE sysreg support. Cc: Mike Leach <redacted> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 32 +++++++++++++ drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c index 9edf8be..9e92d2a 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c@@ -114,6 +114,38 @@ void etm4x_sysreg_write(u64 val, u32 offset, bool _relaxed, bool _64bit) } } +u64 ete_sysreg_read(u32 offset, bool _relaxed, bool _64bit) +{ + u64 res = 0; + + switch (offset) { + ETE_READ_CASES(res) + default : + WARN_ONCE(1, "ete: trying to read unsupported register @%x\n", + offset);Alignmentquoted
+ } + + if (!_relaxed) + __iormb(res); /* Imitate the !relaxed I/O helpers */ + + return res; +} + +void ete_sysreg_write(u64 val, u32 offset, bool _relaxed, bool _64bit) +{ + if (!_relaxed) + __iowmb(); /* Imitate the !relaxed I/O helpers */ + if (!_64bit) + val &= GENMASK(31, 0); + + switch (offset) { + ETE_WRITE_CASES(val) + default : + WARN_ONCE(1, "ete: trying to write to unsupported register @%x\n", + offset);Alignmentquoted
+ } +}The etm4x_sysreg_xyz() equivalent of these use a pr_warn_ratelimited() rather than a WARN_ONE(). With that: Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Converted to pr_warn_ratelimited() to both instances and fixed Alignment Cheers Suzuki _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel