Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Fix PMU instance naming
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-28 21:08:44
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:12:43 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
Although it's neat to avoid the suffix for the typical case of a single PMU, it means systems with multiple CMN instances end up with inconsistent naming. I think it also breaks perf tool's "uncore alias" logic if the common instance prefix is also the full name of one. Avoid any surprises by not trying to be clever and simply numbering every instance, even when it might technically prove redundant.
Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
[1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Fix PMU instance naming
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/79d7c3dca99f
[2/2] perf/arm-cmn: Move IRQs when migrating context
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/1c8147ea89c8
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel