Thread (23 messages) flat view 23 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-08
STALE2036d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)

1 review trailer.

[PATCH 15/18] KVM: arm64: Fix hyp_cpu_pm_{init, exit} __init annotation

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-07 11:52:59
Also in: kvm, kvmarm
Subsystem: arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), kernel virtual machine for arm64 (kvm/arm64), the rest · Maintainers: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Linus Torvalds

The __init annotations on hyp_cpu_pm_{init,exit} are obviously incorrect,
and the build system shouts at you if you enable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH.

Nothing really bad happens as we never execute that code outside of the
init context, but we can't label the callers as __int either, as kvm_init
isn't __init itself. Oh well.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <redacted>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201223120854.255347-1-maz@kernel.org (local)
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ab782c480e9a..04c44853b103 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1568,12 +1568,12 @@ static struct notifier_block hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb = {
 	.notifier_call = hyp_init_cpu_pm_notifier,
 };
 
-static void __init hyp_cpu_pm_init(void)
+static void hyp_cpu_pm_init(void)
 {
 	if (!is_protected_kvm_enabled())
 		cpu_pm_register_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb);
 }
-static void __init hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void)
+static void hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void)
 {
 	if (!is_protected_kvm_enabled())
 		cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb);
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help