Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Revert "add DCN support for aarch64"
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-04 16:44:33
Also in:
amd-gfx, dri-devel
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 17:27, Alex Deucher [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:17 AM Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 23:26, Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 19:00, Alex Deucher [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:53 PM Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This reverts commit c38d444e44badc557cf29fdfdfb823604890ccfa. Simply disabling -mgeneral-regs-only left and right is risky, given that the standard AArch64 ABI permits the use of FP/SIMD registers anywhere, and GCC is known to use SIMD registers for spilling, and may invent other uses of the FP/SIMD register file that have nothing to do with the floating point code in question. Note that putting kernel_neon_begin() and kernel_neon_end() around the code that does use FP is not sufficient here, the problem is in all the other code that may be emitted with references to SIMD registers in it. So the only way to do this properly is to put all floating point code in a separate compilation unit, and only compile that unit with -mgeneral-regs-only. But perhaps the use of floating point here is something that should be reconsidered entirely. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <redacted> Cc: Daniel Vetter <redacted> Cc: Daniel Kolesa <redacted> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>Can rebase this on Linus' master branch? There were a number of new asics added which copy pasted the ARM64 support.Not sure what you are asking me here. Reverting commit c38d444e44badc5 on top of mainline is not going to fix the other code that was added. Or are you asking me to go and find the patches (how many?) that added new ASICs and fix them for arm64? Note that this code is critically broken, as it may corrupt user process state arbitrarily. So if new code was added that contains the same bug, it should be reverted so that the respective authors can fix it and resubmit.Is this simply about dropping the newly added references to $(dml_rcflags) from the Makefile? Because that is quite trivial ...Yes, I was thinking something like the attached patch.
Cheers, that builds fine with v5.11-rc2/defconfig plus CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU=m _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel