Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-04

Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-main: Add ICSSG nodes

From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-21 15:45:31
Also in: linux-devicetree

On 1/21/21 9:37 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 13:48-20210114, Suman Anna wrote:
[...]
quoted
+
+		icssg1_intc: interrupt-controller@20000 {
+			compatible = "ti,icssg-intc";
+			reg = <0x20000 0x2000>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 263 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 264 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 266 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 267 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 268 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 269 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			interrupt-names = "host_intr0", "host_intr1",
+					  "host_intr2", "host_intr3",
+					  "host_intr4", "host_intr5",
+					  "host_intr6", "host_intr7";

Could you look at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/rbZrv3sDFk/
Yes, I am aware of these, and I have already noted it in my cover-letter.
"Note that the interrupt nodes will generate a warning about missing
'#address-cells' when compiled using W=2, but adding that currently
fails the dtbs_check, so going with the dt binding compliance."

I have submitted two incremental patches, one against the binding [1] and
another against dts [2].

regards
Suman

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210115205819.19426-1-s-anna@ti.com/
[2]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210115210625.20427-1-s-anna@ti.com/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help