Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] iommu: Remove obsolete comment
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Date: 2021-01-19 11:39:48
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:52:09 +0100 Jean-Philippe Brucker [off-list ref] wrote:
Commit 986d5ecc5699 ("iommu: Move fwspec->iommu_priv to struct
dev_iommu") removed iommu_priv from fwspec. Update the struct doc.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org
Hi Jean-Philippe,
Flags parameter doesn't have any docs in this structure and should
do given kernel-doc should be complete. It probably spits out a warning
for this if you build with W=1
Not sure if it makes sense to fix that in this same patch, or as a different
one as the responsible patch is a different one.
Looks like that came in:
Commit 5702ee24182f ("ACPI/IORT: Check ATS capability in root complex nodes")
Also, good to get this patch merged asap so we cut down on the noise in the
interesting part of this series!
FWIW
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Jonathan
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- include/linux/iommu.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h index b3f0e2018c62..26bcde5e7746 100644 --- a/include/linux/iommu.h +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h@@ -570,7 +570,6 @@ struct iommu_group *fsl_mc_device_group(struct device *dev); * struct iommu_fwspec - per-device IOMMU instance data * @ops: ops for this device's IOMMU * @iommu_fwnode: firmware handle for this device's IOMMU - * @iommu_priv: IOMMU driver private data for this device * @num_pasid_bits: number of PASID bits supported by this device * @num_ids: number of associated device IDs * @ids: IDs which this device may present to the IOMMU
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel