On 1/29/21 6:09 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:56 PM Vincenzo Frascino
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Andrey,
On 1/29/21 5:40 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
quoted
I suggest to call end_report(&flags, 0) here and check addr !=0 in
end_report() before calling trace_error_report_end().
Probably this is better as:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS))
Because that condition passes always addr == 0.
Not sure I understand. Call report_end(&flags, 0) and then there do:
if (addr) trace_error_report_end(...);
Although maybe it makes sense to still trace all async bugs to address
0. Or to some magic address.
Alex, WDYT?
What I meant is instead of:
if (addr) trace_error_report_end(...);
you might want to do:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)) trace_error_report_end(...);
because, could make sense to trace 0 in other cases?
I could not find the implementation of trace_error_report_end() hence I am not
really sure on what it does.
--
Regards,
Vincenzo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel